jewelry making beads wholesale in india Gil Deleuz's philosophical achievements

downton abbey jewelry wholesale Gilles Louis Rénédeleuze (1925-1995) postmodern philosophers in France. Deller was born on January 18, 1925 in Paris, the capital of France. After graduating from middle school in 1944, he entered the Department of Philosophy of the University of Sorbon, Paris, and began to commit to philosophical research. One of his philosophical ideas is the study of desire, and from this to start to centralized and overall attacks.
Gil. Deleuze is a huge postmodern philosopher in France. It is a key figure in the French French French Nietzsche Movement since the 1960s. It is the passion for French -style philosophy and philosophy of desire. Today, the influence of Deleuze is full of humanities in all corners of humanities. His "Anti -Odapus" and "Thousands of Plateau" have gained a worldwide reputation. In view of the fact that Dellez has not yet gained due attention in my country's academic community, we deliberately published the following articles in order to arouse the intellectual community's interest and emphasis on Deleuze. Dellez's early main philosophical work (first cooperation with him) can be simply summarized to systematically reverse the relationship between classical shapes and "the same" and "difference" in school. In classic and in school, the difference is derived from the same: "X is different from Y because the nature of X with a fixed nature and the nature of fixed nature Y is different." Deleuze believes that all the same nature is formed by differences. The same is not logical or metaphysical. "There is also differences between the same type of objects in nature." That is to say, we classify "the same nature" from the difference. Obviously, the same nature is built by endless differences: "Big X is a different set of various small X, and small X is a different set of various X ..." Faced with the real world, Dleruze believes that we must be that we must have to Grasp the existence of the truth, and the concept of the classification method cannot reach the inner difference. "If philosophy really cares about things, it must be 'about catching things itself, where they are where they are, and they are reached. "The philosophy of the internal differences of things"
, such as Kant and Bergson, Demeruze believes that the traditional space -time view is based on the position and movement of the subject. He believes that pure differences are "non -space -time", and the difference is a concept of "the virtual" (virtual). "The Virtual" (virtual) here is not the "virtual" of "virtual reality", but the definition of "Realing" in "Remembering the Water": "Real withtating Actual, Ideal Without Being abstract ". (The Chinese translation of this work "reality rather than now, ideal and not abstract") The "virtual" of Dellez said in this sense. In other words, Deller's "virtual" is the "non -entity of the past" as "the past" as "the present". Deller's "virtual" is the environmental condition of the current real experience and the inherent differences of the material itself. The difference between Dellez about the difference is that it is not the abstraction of practice. It is a system that does work -the structure of the relationship between the difference. This system builds a real space, time, and perception. At the same time, Dellez believes that the existence and concepts are single, that is, all perceptions are proved from "one". Here, Deleuze borrowed the theory of "monomer in the sense of ontology" by the medieval philosopher Dunis Sin. In the medieval debate about God, many well -known philosophers including Thomas Aquina believed that when God said "God is good", God's "good" is only similar to the "good" of human beings in the sense of rhetoric. Essence When Si Dan said that when it was said that "God is good", God's "good" and "good" in "Jenny" are the same meaning "good" -the two "good" It's just similar, but fundamentally consistent -there is only a difference between the two. When it comes to the concepts of attributes such as "good" and "power", these concepts are applied to single, whether they are applied to God, man or worm.
Eraze to apply single theory to "the existence is a single difference". "This is not to say that the difference itself is inevitable, but that the existence is absolute (single). Differential attributes. Furthermore, it is not that we '(absolutely) is a differential existence that is different from us. "Here," Here, Deller echoed and reversed Supinosa's argument: "All the existences are the deformation of 'one'." Dellez believes that there is no "one", only the flow of flowing forever. Dellez summarizes this as "one equal to more".
"Different and Repeated" is the most persistent and systematic work in this metaphysics. Similar concepts have developed in other works, such as "internal planes" and "chaos" in "Anti -Odipus", "Internal Planes" and "Chaos" in "Anti -Odipus". The unusual metaphysics of Deller requires an unusual episodes of epistemology. This understanding theory that he calls it "the steering of the image of Thoughts." Deleuze believes that the image of thoughts in classic theories such as Aristotle, Descartes, Husserl, and other classic theories will be mistakenly believed to be an unparalleled behavior: truth may be difficult to obtain, but thinking must be capable Obtaining the right facts and concepts; the eyes and neutral angles of God may be difficult to achieve, but that is the ideal goal of our rational thinking; the truthfulness of the certainty and the orderly extension of the perception. Deluze rejected the classic epistemology through the metaphysical "flow". He believes that real thinking is a violent confrontation with reality and an unconscious rupture of orderly. The real world can change and adjust our thinking. Dellez believes that, instead of thinking about the real world, it is better to say that our thinking is "unknown thinking" -n a process of thinking that is not based on the initiative to solve the problem, but by the problem. "All the runes, theorems, etc. as the premise, they are not born by accident, but they are not unreasonable. They are like theology: you believe, it is, its rational logic operates. The belief carved in rationality: it is not a certain principle hidden in irrational, but is interspersed between irrational elements and is only defined as a specific relationship between irrational elements. And flow. "
In starting from his unique epistemology, Deleuze has his own unique interpretation of the history of philosophy. Reading philosophical works are no longer seeking a certain explanation, but a try to show a philosopher trying to grasp the real difficulties. "Philosophers introduce new concepts and explain them, but we will not tell us that these concepts are response to the problem ... The history of philosophy should not just repeat the words of philosophers, but pay attention to the subconscious and hints that philosophers have not said." N, in the same way, Deller believes that rather than saying that philosophy should be regarded as a seeking to seek truth, it is better to say that philosophy is the creation of concepts. For Dellerto, the concept is not a fixed condition or proposition before, but the definition of a series of thoughts (such as Plato's concept, Descartes' thinking, etc.). A philosophical concept "asserted concepts and objects when it was created." Dellez believes that philosophy is therefore more like a practical or artistic work, rather than a subsidiary of the real world that can be described in the physical world in a scientific language as Locke and Kainy.
In his subsequent works, Dellez distinguishes art, philosophy and science as three different specifications. Each has its own different way of interpreting the world: the concept of philosophy creation, the specific specific perception of art creation The way of expression, scientifically created a special theory based on meta -point and functional elements. Deleuze believes that these three specifications are not divided into high. They are different ways to interpret the flow of flowing up and organize the form, "". For example, Dellez does not think the movie is a real expression of the outside world, but believes that it is an ontological practice that creates a new movement and time organization (see "Movie I: Sports-Image"). Philosophy, science and art are equal and essentially creative and practical. Therefore, compared to "Is it true?", "What is it", Direg suggested that we ask us with functional and practical issues, such as "what did it do?", "How does it start? effect". Deller's explanation method
The research on philosophers and artists is deliberately heresy. In "Nietzsche and Philosophy", Deller claims that Nietzsche's "Moral Spectrum" is a kind of attempt to rewrite Kant's "Pure Rough Criticism". The moral chapter is also far from Kant's attention. Similarly, Deller claims that single meaning is the organizational principle of Supinosa's philosophy, although Speringa did not mention these at all. Dellez once specifically described his method of explaining the philosopher as "Buggery": a sneaky way to use the theory of an author to form a weird and different theory. In these works, Dellez did not show the thoughts of Nietzsche and Spearza in truth, but to refine and Everbright. He thought it was useful. The method of re -describing other philosophers' thoughts was not a deliberate misunderstanding, but the practice of "internal creativity" he insisted on him. Similarly, in Dellez's view, in his own mathematics and scientific language: "I am not talking about Renais and Prigogine, Godard, and R. Too René Thom does the same thing. I pointed out that there are many similarities between the scientificization of the equation and the filmization of the image. Different concepts. "